Search found 199 matches

Go to advanced search

by Innerwolf
May 19 2015 04:10
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

Carving hole: hole saw and PVC tubing may do the trick (IIRC PVC glue also glue ABS plastic of model kits) Rotor: spare old computer fan ? or rebuild in plasticard like the rotors of that: http://puppetswar.com/product.php?id_product=187 Nice! But I fear I could ruin the paintjob carving the hole. ...
by Innerwolf
May 19 2015 11:30
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

Hi! I come here once again to ask you for some advice. With a dual modelling/gaming motivation i want to modify my Wobbegong. From the modelling point of view I always wanted to give it a certain Avengers' Hellicarrier vibe by mounting big vertical rotors into the wide, flat wings. From the gaming p...
by Innerwolf
Aug 01 2014 09:29
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

I did. Being my first time doing big-scale milliput work I think I was too careful sanding. Next time I will nail it.
by Innerwolf
Jul 29 2014 06:49
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: XV9 : Yay or nay ?
Replies: 48
Views: 8414

Re: XV9 : Yay or nay ?

Vector Dancer won't do much for the Razorshark, IMO, as all its weapons are Turreted 360 degrees. It's a rule designed more for fixed-forward weaponry, like Vultures and Crimson Hunters. Also your Sunshark argument that it can fire Ion Blasts is rendered moot. The Interceptor Drones do not have Vel...
by Innerwolf
Jul 29 2014 06:10
Forum: Archival Datacore
Topic: Comparison of Tau flyers
Replies: 82
Views: 20038

Re: [Flyer Comparison] Barracuda vs. Razorshark vs. Sunshark

I know ATT is not the place for house rules, but I wanted to drop that: as it's quite obvious the Razorshark was intended to have a special rule justifying the afterburner "drones" replacing the interceptor drones of the Sunshark (plus the mentions in the background of it being the faster ...
by Innerwolf
Jul 29 2014 04:30
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

Thanks a lot for the kind compliments and the attention. It's a pleasure to get such a reception for my project.

If you want more details in the process in case you wanted to replicate it, just ask me! :)
by Innerwolf
Jul 28 2014 02:58
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

The paintjob is intended to simulate a starry night, which would work as a good camouflage in night attacks :) http://i60.tinypic.com/jimivt.jpg http://i58.tinypic.com/28cdnj7.jpg Here you can see the networked markerlight turret http://i59.tinypic.com/sor48w.jpg
by Innerwolf
Jul 27 2014 05:13
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

The white effect is supposed to be reminiscent of sea foam, going hand-in-hand with the wave-like pattern. The letters read: O'res Mont'ka, "powerful killing blow" the pet name of this certain fighter. http://i58.tinypic.com/155067d.jpg http://i57.tinypic.com/2aki8gk.jpg http://i62.tinypic...
by Innerwolf
Jul 27 2014 04:44
Forum: Project Logs
Topic: Paintee's Project Log
Replies: 44
Views: 10540

Re: Ragged Tau and Converted Devilfish

Hey! It looks good to me.
The answer is: this forum discourages posters from posting if they don't have meaningful contributions, so most of them will view the content and leave.
I don't agree with that policy and I believe it results in a dead forum, but I can only give my honest opinion :D
by Innerwolf
Jul 27 2014 04:11
Forum: Modelling
Topic: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)
Replies: 25
Views: 9862

Re: Tigershark AX1-1-1:Wobbegong(conversion from B2 model kit)

modelglue I was lucky to grab one for around 50 bucks (with shipping) on Ebay :) They would have been brilliant as seekers, but for now I'm not using them. Shas'o Deepstrike The original was big but not enough to be used as a Manta. After the conversion it's slightly larger than a Tigershark. I dec...
by Innerwolf
Jul 25 2014 04:56
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

Actually coffeeGrunt, what it says is that you roll on the Destroyer weapon table instead of rolling for armor penetration (to see if a hit is glancing or penetrating). It then goes on to call hits (rolled for on the DWAT) from destroyer weapons penetrating hits. The rule book makes clear (on page ...
by Innerwolf
Jul 25 2014 09:52
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

I think that this is a problem of not keeping up to date with the editions. In 6th edition, rolling a 1 on the D weapon attack table resulted in a penetrating hit, as per Escalation and Apocalypse. However, if you'll look at the FAQ's for both of those books, they tell you to ignore the rules for D...
by Innerwolf
Jul 25 2014 06:21
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

But it still has a minor effect: against regular vehicles it makes easier to get inmovilized/weapon destroyed/explode results in case they aren't destroyed outright You don't roll on the Vehicle Damage Chart with Destroyer Weapons at all, they have a separate chart that simply inflicts Hull Point d...
by Innerwolf
Jul 24 2014 09:23
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

However, under Superheavy Fliers, it makes it a bit unclear. Super-heavy Flyers are Flyers that have the additional rules and exceptions given below.... Super-heavy Flyers are Super-heavy vehicles and use the Super-heavy vehicle rules for Shooting, Vehicle Damage, Catastrophic Damage and Transports...
by Innerwolf
Jul 24 2014 08:09
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

I don't understand why would GW leave that rule out of the main 7th edition rulebook.
by Innerwolf
Jul 24 2014 06:53
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

E'nigma wrote:
What's worse is Super Heavies can't jink!


Where does it says that? Super Heavy flyers are flyers in all respects, and all flyers can jink.
by Innerwolf
Jul 24 2014 06:11
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark
Replies: 72
Views: 16671

Re: APOC, Tiger Shark AX10 VS Warhound, and the Tigershark

As we are stuck with what we have, let's look on the bright side. I have previously dismissed the relevance of our D weapon being AP1 (compared to AP 2 on pulsars and other blast Ds). But it still has a minor effect: against regular vehicles it makes easier to get inmovilized/weapon destroyed/explod...

Go to advanced search