Panzer wrote:Just because T'au aren't winning tournaments doesn't mean Commander are too cheap or Crisis etc. too expensive.
It's rather like in 7th with Tyranids. Commander spam is one of the few things that we have left to still have a chance to even compete with other lists.
Also Daemon Princes are strong, yes, but CSM have enough other things they can take to have a strong list. Daemon Princes still have to get into melee after all.
akaron79 wrote:But you should agree that considering undercosted a unit that even being spammed is not A+ in the meta means that probably it's not so undercosted overall.
Tanniith wrote:Unfortunately it's not really that commanders are underpriced, it's that crisis suits and most battlesuits are overpriced. We're priced like we're an elite army but in reality we have an unreliable BS and are fragile for our points unless we take swarms of drones.
A better option is reducing the number of weapons commanders can take to 2 or 3, and allow them to then take 1 or 2 support systems while also either reducing the points cost of all battlesuits, or increasing their BS to 3+
I have a feeling we will get something like this in the codex where you will now have to choose between strike commanders and buff commanders.
Tanniith wrote:The problem with leaving it as is but choosing between two types is people will take one buff commander then 9 strike commanders.
Glarblar wrote:Tanniith wrote:The problem with leaving it as is but choosing between two types is people will take one buff commander then 9 strike commanders.
Hmm, good point. What if a signature system took up 2 slots and you could only have 1 per commander?
It doesn't feel right to me but it feels balance3d
Users browsing this forum: Kerrygan and 10 guests