Warrio wrote:This was easily the least convenient way that I have ever seen images distributed for viewing. Ever..
Tael was looking for constructive criticism, and he asked for a pm by members to explain their thoughts. This would have been a better way to communicate your view rather than post a comment like this in the Voting page. That being said, I'm sorry it was a problem for you. Perhaps you should consider updating your Acrobat Reader along with your normal windows (or w/e OS your using) updates... therefor, no longer having trouble saving it to your downloads folder and viewing it at your leisure after Tael put so much time into compiling it for us in the first place.
Wolfs16 wrote:Well I guess all that bribe money worked! :p
Gotta admit Wolf, it's almost too evident which entry is yours. Your entries are all different, but they always have the Wolf fingerprint on them. Congrats on the win, hope Duredhel does your avatar right (though for him it should be a breeze).
Now how about we all include in out posts, what influences our choices. It would be interesting to see if it's painting, a type of conversion work or even background. I know for myself, I am always attracted to entries that have a clear theme and adapt the use of bitz accordingly.
Painting to me is most of it, but I like seeing a cleanly converted model. If it has a general idea, adding 100% of detail based around the theme isn't necessary as long as it's still pretty.
By the way, what was used for the bases on #10?
If I had to guess, tank fly bases.