KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Use this area for all discussions of the "gaming" aspect of 40K/Tau.
User avatar
SinisterSamurai
Kor'La
Posts: 363

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#31 » Sep 18 2015 07:34

Vector Strike wrote:
gmaleron wrote:Good to know, either way I am thinking the ion arms are the way to go personally. Also I've noticed that it specifically says this is for Codex Tau Empire, meaning us Farsight Enclave players will have to bring an allied detachment to field it, that is if the Farsight Enclaves book is viable with the new codex


Tearphoenix wrote:I find it interesting that the rules are not listed as experimental. I wonder if that was intentional or an oversight?


Noticed those as well. No experimental would mean the IA14 is pretty close... or an oversight. The rules are too crude for a model of such weight as well. I'd guess they forgot the stamp.

And the option for codex... Yeah, that could be a signal the codex won't change its name.

It could also mean that an IA might not too far off, and the online rules might be taken down by then. I also note that it doesn't list FNP or stomp in the parenthetical for Gargantuan Creature, despite both of those being listed in the 7th ed rulebook for GC.

User avatar
Emagdnim
Shas
Posts: 361

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#32 » Sep 18 2015 08:01

Emailed FW about the fnp/ stomp
" Blasphemy is a victimless crime"

User avatar
KuroRyu
Shas'La
Posts: 278
Contact:

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#33 » Sep 18 2015 08:01

Also I've noticed that it specifically says this is for Codex Tau Empire, meaning us Farsight Enclave players will have to bring an allied detachment to field it, that is if the Farsight Enclaves book is viable with the new codex


Farsight enclaves take options from Codex Tau Empire, after all FSE is a supplement, not a codex in its own right. I would imagine that if they release a differently named tau codex they'll errata the FSE book to say 'replace all instances of Tau Empire codex with [insert new codex name here]'
Last edited by KuroRyu on Sep 18 2015 08:04, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Das'Kyman
Shas'Vre
Posts: 1159

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#34 » Sep 18 2015 08:02

Forgeworld has given the impression in emails that the 'experimental' stamp doesn't really apply anymore. After all, it is something of an outdated concept from when Forgeworld wasn't normally allowed in regular 40k. The Knight variants didn't get 'experimental' stamps when their rules hit either.

It doesn't seem like the 'Titan Killer' that we were expecting. It only has access to one D weapon, which is an amazing weapon but isn't going to be killing very many Imperial Knights right away. The barrage mode actually reminds me of the old R'varna. Looks like it will absolutely punish anything that groups together, no matter what it is.

I find it quite interesting that the WS is 3 and that the BS is 4. It makes those high volume arm-mounted weapons much more attractive. The shield is also hilarious (again, similar to the old R'varna) and I can already hear the rage. Halving the lucky 6 from a D weapon makes this model much more viable in non-apocalypse games.
The overwatch defense is fantastic as well. 16 twin-linked BS2 pulse shots is nothing to sneeze at.

And for 600 points, it is quite reasonable. The Tesseract Vault is only a little less in points. A wraithknight is half the points, but everyone thinks the WK is a bit on the cheap side. Plus even two WK would have trouble killing the KX-139 while the KX-139 can kill a WK per turn, easy. You could buy 3 Riptides instead of this bad boy, but I think it actually doesn't sound like that bad of a tradeoff to me, considering the firepower this thing has.

User avatar
jay170788
Shas
Posts: 79

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#35 » Sep 18 2015 08:09

One thing that seems a little off is that the vigilance defence system says it has two twin-linked burst cannons and two smart missile systems. The smart missile systems aren't stated as twin-linked but on the model they clearly look twin-linked, am hoping this is just an oversight.

Jay
Veritas Vos Liberabit

User avatar
Vector Strike
Shas'La
Posts: 790

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#36 » Sep 18 2015 08:12

Krewl wrote:Well, that's my 3rd post here. I just love the model, I'm getting this for my birthday. (Sadly that's half a year away..)
I have not seen any rules for that 5 barrel gun, posted earlier in this thread. The Fusion gun has 5 shots, but the pictured one does not look like Tau Fusion to me.


They look more like XV9's fusion weapons. There are no other arm configurations, so the 5-barrel gun is the melta one (not very good in my view - 10 meltas can be easily arranged in 5 crisis suits...)

XV566
Shas
Posts: 82

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#37 » Sep 18 2015 08:12

hmmm... I don't see supporting fire on there anywhere. Wonder if that's on purpose.

User avatar
Emagdnim
Shas
Posts: 361

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#38 » Sep 18 2015 08:23

I was expecting more random fusion cascade style. So which do we think us better ? The variety of the ion which can put out 3x las cannons shots at 60 or the fusion which pumps out 5 mm shots ?.

It also sounds like you could have one of each arm ?
" Blasphemy is a victimless crime"

User avatar
Deepstrike
Shas
Posts: 355

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#39 » Sep 18 2015 08:26

XV566 wrote:hmmm... I don't see supporting fire on there anywhere. Wonder if that's on purpose.


It only has supporting fire for the counterpoint Defence system... Albeit at bs 2.... ;)

User avatar
Emagdnim
Shas
Posts: 361

Re: KX-139 Ta'unar Supremacy Armour discussion

Post#40 » Sep 18 2015 08:27

It has over watch , can't see supporting fire mentioned
" Blasphemy is a victimless crime"

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests