Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Battle Reports and debriefing thoughts about your Tau in action
User avatar
GND
Shas'La
Posts: 77

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#19 » Apr 12 2013 01:10

As someone who plays against DE a lot (about 1/3 of my games), I approve of what people have said so far, all excellent advice.

To add to the S7 debate, missile pods are seriously good against DE. They deny armour saves (except for Incubi), cause instant death and deny FnP (except for Grotesques and Reavers) and can kill any vehicle. In my first 6ed match against DE, I tried a list that maximised missile pods. It was a stupid list, I rolled badly and ended up killing 90% of his points by turn 4 (I had a lot of casualties though).

You can negate Reavers by clever positioning. They have to pass over you in a straight line when using Bladevanes. Therefore they have to have space behind your unit where all of the jetbikes can fit. Remember this when moving and deploying. Even if you fail to prevent it (which is admittedly hard and terrain dependant), at least force him to end up in a bad spot (those bikes that ended in the top right corner? He wanted to have them there. Try to avoid that.)

With the new SMS and if you don't have markerlights, a thing to consider is to move the HH, fire the SMS at full BS and snap-shot the rail gun (solid slug). More wounds without saves, rather than potentially more hits, with saves allowed.

And while the new Missile-sides look promising (I haven't played them yet), AP1 weaponry is useful for dealing with loaded DE transports. 2/3 chance for explosions from any penetrating hit, and those explosions can wipe half of what is inside.

Target priority is Loaded transports > Bikes > Squishy troops. Don't fear dark lances, they don't do much.

@Adeptus
Tetras are good against DE because they need to use their tank killing weapons against them, as almost everything else is poisonous.

User avatar
Len'Ra
Shas
Posts: 31

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#20 » Apr 12 2013 01:24

I have played Dark Eldar a few times, so here are my two cents.

From what I have found from reading into Dark Eldar tactics for fighting against Tau, they usually try to give us "target saturation", or present too many options for us too shoot at. Now, from my experience these transports are very fragile, and can not only be easily destroyed by our anti-tank units, but by Fire Warriors as well. I have done a quick MathHammer to see what the exact numbers are and here are the fruits of my labor:

Shooter BS____Weapon Strength___Number of Shots__Hits_____AV of Target_________# of Pen___# of Glances
_____3_______________5_________________12___________6____10 (open-topped)__________1___________1

(Sorry that there are these lines, it is the only way I could get it to be formatted right)
~Courtesy of MathHammer40k.com

So, we get one penetrating hit and one glancing hit per 12 BS3 Pulse Rifle/Carbine shots. Not too bad if you have no infantry to be firing at and venoms and raiders are everywhere. However, this number increases when we use markerlights to strip cover saves (other than the Flickerfield which I believe is an invulnerable save of 6+) or get in rapid fire range. Of course, you don't want them in rapid fire range as you will suddenly have 10 Wyches in your face upon disembarkation. Don't underestimate their shooting either, they can kill Devilfish and Hammerheads pretty easily with Dark Lances and Scourges. Seeker missiles or SMS are also good alternative ways to deal with them. And yes, missile pods also work wonders on Dark Eldar.
Hope it helped :fear: !

~Len'ra

Ire
Shas
Posts: 88

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#21 » Apr 12 2013 02:18

My 2nd army is DE, but since I haven't had a DE/tau matchup all I can tell you is what I worry about as a DE player.

The point about reavers having a limited area behind you unit for bladevane attacks is very important and with practice can be predictable. Be ready to kill them when they land there (or even assault them, reavers are actually not great when charged, and this ties up their shooting/bladevane/hammer of wrath charges)

Sniper units can be effective, pick out their basters, splinter cannons, reaver caltrops/heat lances, haemonculi, and so on.

Flamers are terrifying for most DE units, especially wall of death against wyches. Most of their army relies on cover saves, so anything you can use to ignore cover could be very effective. Wyches simply will not charge a triple-Flamer unit (mathammer wall of death would kill 8 of them)

As has been said before, kill the venoms. Even if it means letting the raiders live, a venom deals 4 wounds a turn and cannot be ignored. The exception to this is splinter rack raiders with kabalites - those are higher priority, as they deal 15 wounds per turn so long as the raider is twin linking the passengers guns.

And has been stated volume of St 5/7 fire can really hurt DE. You wound their infantry on 2's with pulse weapons and st7 glances them on 3's.

Don't be afraid to assault their non dedicated melée units. A fire warrior can hold his own against a kabalite warrior (striking last but with a better armor save) so it's better that you get the charge than them (of course, this works best with non-rapid fire weapons.) watching out for IC's, I'd say you could at need assault scourges, reavers, warriors and have a decent chance. Ignoring the "fear factor" of the DE is often psychological edge that can throw off a DE player badly when tau charge him.

With the new codex I'd suggest considering Darkstrider. Shooting with him would drop most DE units down to t2, making them vulnerable to instant death from pulse weapons - particularly scary when you try to take out that archons' shadow field. His d6" retreat could deny some charges too.

Exploding vehicles can soften up their squads quite a bit, often killing a third of the passengers. Fusion range might be hard to get, but perhaps here is a good use of the rail broadside.

As someone else pointed out above, dark lances really are not that great, especially against tau armor. They can certainly do some damage, but as lance will only come into play against a hammerheads front AV, your cover saves and staying out of heat lance/haywire grenade range are more important. I'd be more concerned about dark lances targetting battlesuits, so try to Los or cover your suits for the first turn or two while you deal with the transports.

If he runs a Cronus, kill it before it gets in range, if he runs a talos, ignore it and keep it at range. Heck, if the talos doesn't have the ichor injector I'd say you could charge it with a riptide if you have to (just overload your nova sheild first) but Riptides otherwise might be a poor choice against DE - t6 will be ignored and they *do* have the volume or quality of shots to take it out. If you take it use it as a diversion so he spends time killing it instead of other units.

Don't forget about yor photon grenades rules, and consider EMP grenades, it's a easy kill against any raider that gets too close and could make the DE player decide to stay out of rapid fire range on warrior raiders or he might think twice about raider-ramming/bladevaneing (if he took those options)

And finally, as has been said before, so long as the DE have the mobility advantage, they are winning. don't spread yourself out until youve removed that advantage. Supporting fire will cause most of their units a lot of greif (wyches do NOT get that 4+ dodge save against overwatch FYI)

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#22 » Apr 12 2013 05:47

Wow, lots more great advice. A have another question though.

Having thought about castling doesn't that give him a lot more freedom during his deployment? As it gives him more space to deploy out of range?

User avatar
gr1m_dan
Shas
Posts: 333

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#23 » Apr 12 2013 06:21

Yeah a big DE plus is that the Ravengers can move 12" and fire all 3 Darklances at full BS so just be aware of that. I believe a DL range is 36" or 38" - can't remember off the top of my head. So they will normally hit what they need to. As others have said they are not THAT scary - until you have to take 9 shots from them (yes my friend does the 3 Rav list) - a couple normally get through.

What Dark Eldar do well (and need to) is target saturation, even more so than us because of their weaponry. However they are great at it if loaded up on Venoms + Splinter Cannon Trueborn. These guys will put out A LOT of shots. I can't remember the exact amount but it's not fun. I've seen my friend clean up IG Troop gunlines through sheer amount of rolling. I stress again - take these out ASAP.

Castling up may appear to let him have the upper hand through deployment but we do have some tools to out range him. Dark Eldar may be one the armies that Railsides actually shine against. Whilst Missilesides have numbers of shots on their side the extra range with the rail will either make him play safe and stay back (better for you as you outrange him with a few weapons) or make him attempt to get into his sweet spot for Splinter and Dark Lances and then allow you to use all your St7 missiles from Crisis suits. The AP1 = exploded tank on 3+ (3 + AP1 + Open Topped) - the explosion normally kills most of the squad too due to low T and poor save.
The Shadow that strikes, he that walks unseen

Ire
Shas
Posts: 88

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#24 » Apr 12 2013 06:56

Adeptus wrote:Having thought about castling doesn't that give him a lot more freedom during his deployment? As it gives him more space to deploy out of range?


Think of the DE as a scalpel. Their greatest strength is in their offensive capbilities and mobility - where *they* deploy is actually less important than where *you* deploy, as they are most likely not staying where they start, but are coming to you.

A good DE player has his target priorities down pat, and he'll look at spreading your forces out with diversions and bait so that he can get at the unit he really wants to kill. Having no way around your hardened front rank to the creamy center can be very frustrating to a DE player, so as I said, the key is to fortress up, kill his transports/mobility, then once hes left with just footdar and your jet packs have mobility on him, then you can go hunting.

Of course, you'll have to plan ahead so that you know when your out of time to make a break for the objectives, but tau's new outflanking fun can help a lot with that.

And finally, most DE units top off at 36" shooting range. Allow for their movement speed, but we can outrange them now. If you end up in a long range shooting war against DE you should count yourself lucky.

Yes, a lot of DE players take a lot of dark lances, but that's just another reason they are a tertiery priority - its more important and easier to kill three raiders/venoms then three ravagers.

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#25 » Apr 13 2013 05:55

Ire wrote:Having no way around your hardened front rank to the creamy center can be very frustrating to a DE player, so as I said, the key is to fortress up, kill his transports/mobility, then once hes left with just footdar and your jet packs have mobility on him, then you can go hunting.


Would a defence line be worth considering?

Ire wrote:Of course, you'll have to plan ahead so that you know when your out of time to make a break for the objectives, but tau's new outflanking fun can help a lot with that.


My fear with outflankers is they might come on too soon and get isolated/overwhelmed. If the Aegis is worth taking I might invest in a comm-relay to add some reserve control.

EDIT: Having thought long and hard on all the advice I have devised a new list:

HQ - Ethereal

The ethereal is there to boost moral, and for storm of fire.

Elites - Riptide, twinlinked smartmissile system, stimulant injector,early warning override
Elites - Riptide, twinlinked smartmissile system, stimulant injector,early warning override

The riptides provide lots of S7 for destroying transports, smart missile systems for ignoring cover, override to dissuader the reavers from being reserved, they also give some counter assault capability.

Troops - 11 Firewarriors, Devilfish, disruption pod
Troops - 11 Firewarriors, Devilfish, disruption pod
Troops - 11 Firewarriors, Devilfish, disruption pod

The transports keep the Firewarriors safe from bladevanes, and give them mobility to push out later in the game to capture objectives.

Fast Attack - 5 Marker drones
Fast Attack - 5 Marker drones

Markerlight support that can jump in and out from behind the hammer heads/devilfish.

Heavy Support - Hammer head, ion cannon, smart missile system, disruption pod
Heavy Support - Hammer head, ion cannon, smart missile system, disruption pod

More S7 and smart missiles

Total - 1502

The idea is to castle and use the superior range of the ion weaponry to strip the dark eldar of their mobility before moving out and claiming objectives. The fire warriors and the ethereal are there to dissuade the Dark Eldar from closing in. The army also focuses on mobility with everything being able to move 6" and shoot.

Do the Shas'o who have experience with the Dark Eldar think this list and strategy will give me a good chance?

User avatar
GND
Shas'La
Posts: 77

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#26 » Apr 13 2013 08:47

Seems like solid list, but a few comments.

- The Riptides I cannot judge, as I have no play experience with them. I like the idea with early warning override though. You may end up not needing them but they are cheap.
- I would cut the DPODs form the fishes (but not the HHs). They are too expensive now for you to put them on all your vehicles. Get more Drones and FWs
- IonHeads are nice, but I'm biased for AP1 weapons. I advise you to try both this double IonHead build, and a Railsides + Ionhead and see what works for you best (I'm personally using Railsides and a single Hammerhead and I'm very happy with it).
- If you plan to expand it to a higher point range I suggest going for the new up and coming Mark'O commander build.

Note: when castle-ing up against DE, it does not necessary have to be a tight castle. Just make sure he cannot separate units from the rest of the force.

My fear with outflankers is they might come on too soon and get isolated/overwhelmed


Yeah, I stopped using mine exactly because of this happening. Granted it happened mostly due to poor rolls, but still, I don't think you need them to win.

User avatar
Olannon
Fio'Ui
Posts: 99

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#27 » Apr 13 2013 09:10

I would not drop the dpods from the fish. With the amount of points you`re investing in the fire warriors + ethereal, getting them where you need them is paramount.

Anyway, if we`re discussing a specific list it is better to have it as a topic of its own (and preferably in the right subforum). When discussing tactics against a fraction in general, sample lists are ok but specific lists tend to derail the discussion away from the core of the topic.

With the new codex out it will undoubtably take some time before our playstyle is matched against the other fractions in a standardised way, however this thread has presented multiple key points to keep in mind. The problem often comes when one`s trying to apply abstract and generic concepts in a specific context: i.e. what people say on an internet forum might not always be easy to understand and/or execute in a specific game, due to a plethora of reasons. If anyone has any gaming experience against the Dark Eldar yet, I would really appreciate a battle report and/or some sample diagrams displaying key things going either very well or very bad :) I will make sure and get some diagrams of my own against SM up before the weekend`s over. Perhaps we could compile something through an "enemy of the month" series or something.
A new and unique style of Tau competitive list - click ;)

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#28 » Apr 13 2013 09:24

I will make a separate topic to discuss the list. But would like to keep this one going for a general overview on how to deal with these Fiends.

Olannon wrote:If anyone has any gaming experience against the Dark Eldar yet, I would really appreciate a battle report and/or some sample diagrams displaying key things going either very well or very bad :) I will make sure and get some diagrams of my own against SM up before the weekend`s over. Perhaps we could compile something through an "enemy of the month" series or something.


My opponent is a prolific battle report writer, as shown with the first two reports he posted against me. He will undoubtedly put up another report, for our next game, next week. I'm sure they will be insightful.

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#29 » Apr 13 2013 10:47

Olannon my list seems somewhat similar to the one you talk about in your signature. Do you think that aggressive two turn charge forward is worth considering, the one you discuss at length with diagrams? Or should I follow the castle strategy as suggested by other members?

Ire
Shas
Posts: 88

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#30 » Apr 13 2013 12:19

Regarding that list above, the only thing I'm iffy about is the riptides. Im not saying they are bad, but keep a couple things in mind:
a) the durability of this unit is much lower when facing Dark Eldar. Between all of the poison splinter fire ignoring your t6, instant death melee weapons, and ap2 st 8 heavy/special weapons, the riptide might need to be careful with los/cover and what it can charge.
b) I'd strongly consider the heavy burst Cannon (It seemed like you were talking about using the ion accelerator). High volume of st6 is nasty against t3 and still good against av 10, and the HBC's ap will punch through any of his armor excepting incubi and MC's. perhaps take one of each and see which works better for you. Alternatively crisis suits might be a better option.

As for your tanks, while it is hideously expensive, I would take the Dpods on the devilfish, as transports are high priority targets for him, as all his splinter fire is useless until he had something with a toughness to shoot at. I've also learned not to charge a full transport, as if you crack it open your just left standing there ready to be blast-templated and double-tapped. Keep your troops embarked as long as possible!

SMS are an option but I'd also consider gun drones. All of your tanks should be shuffling around in order to get your jink save, and gun drones provide a free form of counter fire, can shoot at BS 2 when moving 6" and the twin linking is good for faster speeds too. You can detach them mid game to block charges, provide cover, harass the enemy, even charge with them, and carbine's will cause pinning checks. DE have good LD but they can be pinned until the third pain token. I'd even consider them for the hammerheads. Would it be more effective than the SMS's range and ignores cover? Is it worth possibly providing the DE with that many more pain tolkens? Dunno. These are all just suggestions to think about.

As to your question about the ageis defence line. It might help, as DE have very little ignore cover weapons, but only really for your units with 5+ or worse saves, or your Battlesuits/riptides. Most of the fire that is likely to be directed at your fire warriors will be ap5, with the low ap weapons being used on your tanks (likely your transports first) and their main anti infantry low-ap gun (the disintegrator) will go after battle suits (or maybe your marker drone squads.)

However, the additional quad gun and tower might help. Target saturation works in a fashion against DE - being a scalpel army instead of a sledgehammer they can't kill every unit that's a threat to them (which is why target priority and mobility is important to them) so adding something like a quad gun could help. IF you take it, do not be afraid to go to ground at the drop of a hat. Your largely trying to outlast them, which isnt hard if you survive long enough for the glass part of their glass cannon to come into play.

if possible, board setup manipulation can be more important against them than a defense line. Limit the avenues of approach, put difficult terrain between positions you intend to occupy, and try to get a big honking line of sight blocker that you can jump shoot jump from behind.

As for deployment with the above list. I'd be tempted to reserve one of those marker drone squads so that you have a fresh set of matkerlights later on, especially if you are going second. Riptides could be reserved as a counterpunch but that's up to preference. But for the most part I would say that most of that army should start on the board. Hammerheads in the back, Marker drones and riptides jump-shoot- jumping in the middle, and embarked fish in the front ranks. Remember to move all those vehicles for jink saves, and weather the first couple turns as best you can.
Last edited by Ire on Apr 13 2013 01:24, edited 2 times in total.

Ire
Shas
Posts: 88

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#31 » Apr 13 2013 01:22

reading through the 2nd battle report more closely I think I can identify a couple of things that could have been done better (No insult intended at all, your tactics were standard for tau doctrine, but you were fighting a very non-standard foe in the tricksy eldar.)

First off was hammerheads with submuntions are certainly viable, and the submuntion shot is "good enough" compaired to the ion overcharge (and doesnt get hot). However, you used them against reavers, but due to the large size of bikes, even large blasts only hit a couple of them with each shot. You should have pieplated a unit that was more densly packed, like his warriors. don't forget that st 6 wounds ignore his feel no pain.

Secondly was that outflanking your foe with harrassing units is a excellent idea in general - just not against DE. A unit like your stealthsuits will do a little bit of damage but in the end be fairly easy for them to kill and might just provide them with a pain tolken. If you are going to use a stealth team then Id suggest using them as backfield armor hunters once his warriors are forward - but even then you'll only get one shot as the ravagers can outpace your suits, and those reavers can hit you anywhere within 48" so they can out-rapid-response you.

Some of those players made excellent points deconstructing our weaknesses. "Tau are only slightly more mobile than guard" "Moving 12" then shooting makes all the diffrence [compaired to JSJ's 6" then shoot], and "Markerlights being able to buff snapshot can make for some unexpected maneuvers" are lines that caught my eye.

He's a canny dark eldar player, who is not afraid to go to ground. I can see why you wanted a lot of ignores cover weapons. Im not certain that bladevaneing a unit off the table merits a pain tolken, Id have to look up the FAQ's for that one. don't be afraid to go to ground yourself - if it forces him to spend the time to shoot it with more units or to charge it that slows down that unit even more (hopefully). He was right that having special weapons sniped out isnt as big of a downer for DE as it can be for other races (a splinter cannon is just a couple more shots after all) so if you have snipers id look to kill blasters and, very importantly, the squad leader, if one is present. In his list, that would have been the arena champion, who's melee ability alone is as good as the rest of his squad's combined. Other dark eldar armies, the grenades are from the squad leader - kill the squad leader, the squad looses its grenades.

Specifically against that list - don't be afraid to tank shock his warriors out of position/cover. It looks like he is reliant on his backfield lances and forward blasters to get his hit, he's not going to haywire you as I don't see one in that whole list (unless that list is incomplete for wargear) and pushing him out of cover could be a death sentance for his troops. You'll risk a death or glory from the blaster but situationally it could be worth it.

I've made a big deal about killing off all the raiders - thats because a warrior squad without a raider is NOT a mobile squad anymore (fleet on a shooty unit isnt a great advantage). If you don't kill even the empty raiders you can be suprised how fast the DE can redeploy.

I think that this specific dark eldar player is going to try to kill your markerlights asap, he seems quite concerned about them in the writeup (especially with supporting fire). Use that as bait - I remember there was a BA player that I used to play that I knew, no matter what, was going to try to charge his bikes into my broadsides every single game. Predictability is death :)

The key to his list seems to be the reavers. Im suprised he didnt take caltrops on them for all the bladevaneing he did, but that is still a lot of reavers. With blasters, he'll only be closing to 18" before jetting away rather than the 9" his heat lance's would have required, so if he gets closer than that he's thinking about charging something. If possible, charge them, that will deny them two attacks per model (one for hammer of wrath, and the +1 a for chargeing) and while you may loose, you should kill some of them. Kroot would be nice here, as their ap 5 would still be effective. Just be careful about charging them based on the combat drug effect - if he gets initiative or weapon skill or run speed it wont matter much but the +1 a or +1 s rolls could hurt.

Im thinking that a crisis team with missilepod/flamers might be useful against him. flamers are scary to dark eldar, as you could jump out and toast a whole squad of warriors in cover, or wall of death anything that tries to assault your units. When not in flamer range the missile pods are more st7, and for support systems you could either buy them drones with a drone controller for more markerlights, VRT's so they can hit and run out of any assaults, or stims for more durability (as they will be a fairly high priority target for him, but watch out for st 8 lances/blasters ignoring stims). Or maybe just twin link the flamer. Three of those (before drones) will run you less than one of the riptides. perhaps two squads of two?

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#32 » Apr 14 2013 06:42

Ire wrote: (No insult intended at all, your tactics were standard for tau doctrine, but you were fighting a very non-standard foe in the tricksy eldar.)


On the contrary. I appreciate you putting in the time to write two really thorough and helpful posts. Thank you for your considerable insight.

The main reason I was considering the Ion Accelerator was for the range, as it was suggested that I castle initially, take out his ravagers/raiders and then move out. I was concerned with the heavy burst cannon's shorter range forcing me to move out too early.

User avatar
kiyet
Shas
Posts: 127

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#33 » Apr 14 2013 07:08

Friday I played against a Dark Eldar list that included 2x 6-elf reaver squadrons in a Sliscus/Baron build. My (twin linked) SMS systems decimated both reaver jetbike squadrons in my first shooting phase (he went first, bladevaned/caltropped my pathfinders and my broadsides, failing to wipe either unit). However, I did have 6 SMS systems on the table (2 on the broadsides, 1 each on the Riptides, and 1 each on my devilfish), with three firing on each reaver squadron.

My opponent told me that he's going to have to permanently rewrite his list to deal with cover-denial from Tau as a result of that game.
MonT'au?
We're not lost, we're exploring.

Adeptus
Shas
Posts: 33

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#34 » Apr 14 2013 07:14

kiyet wrote:However, I did have 6 SMS systems on the table (2 on the broadsides, 1 each on the Riptides, and 1 each on my devilfish), with three firing on each reaver squadron.


I might give the devilfish in my list SMS. That way I would have seven twinlinked SMS in the list. But they are expensive. I would still have four SMS without them. Tough decision.

kiyet wrote:My opponent told me that he's going to have to permanently rewrite his list to deal with cover-denial from Tau as a result of that game.


Excellent. :D

User avatar
gr1m_dan
Shas
Posts: 333

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#35 » Apr 14 2013 11:44

I played against Dark Eldar today (Venom/Rav spam) and the SMS (only had two) were deadly. Even my friend said they have made them so much better and vital against armies like DE, IG etc.

It's even made me consider taking Missilesides for more silly tricks. You can pretty much take out whole squads of IG/DE hiding behind cover per turn.

I keep running my Devilfish with the SMS and so far it has taken out a lot more than it's points worth - at least two Venoms today plus squads inside before succumbing to a Dark Lance on Turn 5!
The Shadow that strikes, he that walks unseen

User avatar
Olannon
Fio'Ui
Posts: 99

Re: Tactics for taking on the Dark Eldar?

Post#36 » Apr 15 2013 01:45

Adeptus I don't have any experience against Dark Eldar and the concept I've outlined in my army list thread is greatly context dependent. In general, it is a strategy aimed to accomplish board control. If this can more effectively be achieved in another way, then by all means go for it! Against armies that are more mobile than us, the most important thing is to be able to lock this down and dictate the flow of the game. With multiple units advancing your flanks become vulnerable and if an enemy can exploit this you could be in deep trouble.
A new and unique style of Tau competitive list - click ;)

Return to “Battle Reports”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: xerxeshavelock and 1 guest